Review: Armageddapocalypse

Image Post #9764

CHLOE MASHITER is blown away…

*****

An adaptation of Pride and Prejudice will only be a success if you include guns, ninjas and explosions and this show is fantastic. For those of you smart/lucky enough to have already got tickets, I’ll try not to spoil the gags, but I can say that there’s a genuinely unnerving yet hilarious version of The Riddler, an evil genius with a slightly-more-than-platonic love of explosions and maverick operative who has to juggle the difficulties of saving the world, being a father, and getting kicked in the balls.

Ben Ashenden and Jack Monaghan deserve a special mention, the former’s comic timing and mannerisms making a two-line role as an old man trying to buy greetings cards my favourite character in the entire show, whilst Monaghan skilfully juggles every cliché imaginable as the Agency boss.

In a show filled with excellently drawn stereotypes, slightly more comic mileage could have been gotten out of the sexy female sidekick – and there is a somewhat surreal game of poker that is dragged out a little too long – but this really is equivalent to pointing out a pimple on Robert Downey Jr’s face: overall it’s so good that something that small just doesn’t matter. The bottom line is, this show is a perfectly judged spoof with top-notch comic acting and, as one character puts it, ‘fuck off’ explosions. What more could you want?

KATY KING is pretty impressed but thinks you could want a little bit more…

****

Innovative, imaginative and mostly importantly: funny. Armageddapocalypse succeeds in showcasing some of Cambridge's most promising acting, writing and directing talent.

Whilst Ashenden and Owen build on their Good Clean Men personas, Jack Monahan shines in a rare comedic role. It is unfortunate that the only female role is massacred by Máirín O'Hagan. Lacking the confidence and skill of her cast members, O'Hagan fails to find the funny in a script that is littered with comedy gems. Whilst Armageddapocalypse gets off to a strong start, it lags unforgivably towards the end. Although the show simply begs to be edited, the opening ten minutes alone are worth four pounds of your student loan.

 

Photos: Tim Johns - www.timjohns.co.uk

ROB YOUNG can’t quite muster the same enthusiasm…

***

The team behind this week’s ADC Lateshow must have seen the recent Ben Stiller movie Tropic Thunder, as Armageddapocalypse 2: The Explosioning (catchy right?) begins with three piss-take trailers for future blockbusters. Coming never to a multiplex near you is a Billy Elliot style Northern drama about a lactose intolerant miner, a frat boy comedy about vomiting and penises, and a swashbuckling adventure about the history of the London sewer system, which for the purposes of bad punning we shall call Pirates of the Crappibean.

Unfortunately, and just like Tropic Thunder, nothing in the production really hits the comedic heights of the trailer introduction, and Armageddapocalypse 2 is full of expected titters instead of big, you could say explosive, belly laughs. The action movie pastiche is nothing new but when the Armageddapocalypse team find something original to mock the results are brilliant. The inclusion of three scientists who have the stupidity to question the bad guy’s plan is a fantastic twist on characters that usually just stand in the background, clipboard in hand, turning knobs arbitrarily. There are other flashes of genius, namely The Puzzler, the improbable love child of The Riddler and a Parisian transvestite, who gobbles up every scene he is in by spouting paradoxical nonsense like a comic book loony, sadly only gracing two scenes.

For every slow-motion two paces forward that Armageddapocalypse takes, it is blown back by the aftershock of its own struggling originality. Neither pauses from the action to hear interviews from the actors and director of the fake film nor the dodgy American accented, Ron Howard commentary are particularly funny. A few unfortunate technical problems in the piss-take (it’s not really a play is it?) made some scenes painstakingly boring while a Casino Royale parody about the impossibility of understanding poker
is completely misfiring and overlong. Ah, there’s a word. Overlong. Action films are meant to be zippy and exciting.  It’s a simple formula: when there are no guns, add boobies; when there are no boobies, add more boobies.  Play some N.E.R.D. during a scene at a lap dancing club and zoom in on some jiggling, preferably sweat-drenched mammaries… Right, I’m going off on one. Point is, for some reason the Armageddapocalypse ends more times than Lord of the Rings and is at least 15 minutes too long.

I hate myself for not liking it. Action spoofs are potentially hilarious, but Armageddapocalypse isn’t consistently good enough to keep me on the edge of my seat. This isn’t the fault of the cast, who are all excellent; there are just too many obvious jokes and pacing difficulties, making The Explosioning more of a wet fart than an earth-shattering eruption. Boom.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a comment

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

  • yes.34
    January 29, 2010

    the last guy's a cunt head.

  • race321
    January 29, 2010

    Rob Young? More like Rob cunt.

  • Nathan
    January 29, 2010

    Measured responses guys, congratulations. Nope, I agree with him. It's AT LEAST 15 minutes too long and smacks far too much of Tropic Thunder -or Austin Powers anyone?!?- to be quite as good as some other reviews make it out to be. Funny, certainly, but far too pleased with itself.

  • Joe
    January 29, 2010

    I also agree with Rob. It went on for about 45 minutes too long, ended far too many times and didn't nearly live up to the brilliance of the trailers. Which, to give credit where it's due, were incredibly funny.

  • John
    January 29, 2010

    Yeah it did become very Austin Powers-y, just not as funny. I'm with Rob, and the first two comments are too harsh.

  • jeffry99
    January 29, 2010

    i liked rob's review.

    pity he's a cunt

  • Josh
    January 30, 2010

    I know Rob and he's a really nice guy. Go fuck yourself Jeffry you slaaaag

  • alan69er
    January 30, 2010

    I agree with jeffry; josh and rob are cunts

    ps this is a really stimulating forum for articulate debate about drama.

  • jason_statham
    January 30, 2010

    Rob has completely missed the point; the action films that they are parodying are not the 'short, snappy' ones, but rather, the slightly irritating and repetitive. It's shocking that the irony has been lost on this reviewer. Maybe The Tab could only appoint one reviewer next time- and not Rob Cunt?

  • Chris M
    January 30, 2010

    I think short and snappy goes hand in hand with irritating and repetetive. The reviewer got the irony, it just wasn't imaginitive enough for him. It's a pretty fair review really. You need to leave off this Rob guy! His review was the best one!

  • Bob
    January 30, 2010

    I'm sorry Jason but that's complete poo. You cannot parody something slightly irritating and repetitive by being irritating and slightly repetetive. It has to be funny, there have to be jokes ABOUT the problems in these films. Otherwise it's not a parody, it's just a bad action film. It's shocking that the main point about parodies has been lost on Jason.

  • Bob
    January 30, 2010

    Although I have to say that while I think rob's review is fair, the random deviation into sweat-drenched mammaries is odd to say the least.

  • Simon
    January 30, 2010

    Of all the reviews, the fairest and best-written one is Rob's. He hasn't just criticised the shit out of the play, merely given his opinions and backed them up, rather than completely licking arse like the other two vapid reviewers. Not that I've actually seen the play but it's nice to read a review that's actually an interesting read and not just a list of superlatives…

    Long live Rob.
    Although, from past experience he can be a bit of a cunt sometimes…

  • Matt34
    January 31, 2010

    Yeah, credit where it's fair enough due, Rob's review is cogent and incisive. I think he penetrates to the main problems of the play (If you can call it that lol!) and discusses them in a balanced manner. The fact that's he's a cunt shouldn't come into it.

  • dave19
    February 1, 2010

    I think Rob's right on the money – this show was very obvious and predictable. I predicted it was going to happen several weeks before it started. He's honest about what he wanted – sweaty, bouncing boobs. I'm glad at least one reviewer had the courage to say that, even if they are a cunt. Like Simon I also didn't actually see this play but I imagined what it was like and agree the first two reviews do NOT match up to how I imagined the play to actually be.

  • Ben Swaine
    February 2, 2010

    Oi, Roberto Cuntinini, shut it.

  • February 11, 2010

    [...] Saturday we went to see The Armageddapocalypse at a student theatre which was completely packed despite being a 11p.m. show and was a rather well [...]

  • Claire
    February 12, 2010

    Máirín O'Hagan was brilliant. You lot know nothing.