Total Shit Ed’s

Deputy News Editor
13th February 2012

Image Post #78626

St Edmund’s found itself in the shit this weekend, as a faulty pump has left much of the college without adequate plumbing.

Unable to cope with the cold temperatures, the Norfolk building, the largest in the college, has been without running water for 48 hours. Much of the college’s family accommodation has met the same fate.

Most shockingly, toilets in the Norfolk building haven’t been flushed over the weekend, despite the CR holding its May Ball launch party on Saturday night. Efforts by Eddie’s to close off the toilets were met with limited success, as with more revellers than usual the party left the toilets in the eye of a storm on Sunday morning.

The backed up bogs mean residents are still  faced with potentially serious hygiene problems, especially with St Edmund’s offering accommodation to families with babies and children on-site.

Shivering students have also been forced to brave the cold conditions just to fill kettles and were trekking across snow and ice to have showers in other buildings.

A source described the situation as “really scandalous”, and said that “the conditions in the main building are completely unsanitary.”

“I think it is pretty dire that students are living in conditions like this.”

This isn’t the first shortage from St Ed’s, as students have previously been left without hot water for days at a time. Now students will be hoping the plumbing is fixed before the it really hits the fan.

A college receptionist said he hoped the facilities would be working again by later today.

This article originally reported that broken pipes, not a faulty pump, caused the water outage; and that St Edmund’s had previously left students without all water, rather than just hot water. Efforts have been made to acknowledge college’s response to the incident.

These points were corrected following a complaint from a member of college.

28 Responses to “Total Shit Ed’s”

  1. Rebecca Black says:

    We so excited

  2. Lovelace says:

    I don't know about your source, but I was in charge of the May Ball launch party and we've managed not to "left the toilets in the eye of a storm on Sunday morning"

    Furthermore, we had a team of people working in situ just to made sure our guests had good sanitary conditions. Please ask anybody about this fact.

  3. Undergrad says:

    What is St Edmunds?

  4. rcth says:

    As another member of the organisation committee for the St Edmund's May Ball, I would like to add to Lovelace's comment. The decision to continue with the Launch Party was taken only following much discussion, with the approval of the college and with a contingency plan in place. The toilets in the main building were closed and signposted as out of order, with guests being directed to a separate building with operational toilets, and members of the committee were on hand all night in order to deal with any arising issues.

  5. J.W. says:

    It's appalling, the state in which the nation's elderly have to live these days.

  6. Wolfson says:

    Who are St Edmunds?

  7. Eddies says:

    We’re the ones who educated Georges Lemaître and provide the rowing Blues for the boat race. Who are you?

  8. YourMother WouldSay says:

    I don't know which lavatory you were using but the one I was using did not flush and was filled to the brim with fecal nastiness. St. Edmunds Launch Conspiracy? I think so. The sign was definitely missing when I and I would estimate 10-15 others used the facilities without a flush.

    • NotAnIdiot says:

      Either you're a liar or you broke into the locked toilets to use them… The toilets in the main building were locked and sign-posted as out of order. If you went to the ones not in the main building then it wasn't a water problem – it was a problem with you and your 10-15 others failing to grasp the concept of flushing a toilet…

    • Butters says:

      Of the two lavatories in the immediate vicinity of the CR both had signs directing you to fully functional toilets. Both were also obstructed, one with a sofa and the other with a pool cue.

      Members of the May Ball Committee sat by the functional toilets all night in order to ensure they were both accessible and of a acceptable level of cleanliness.

      Unless you and these fifteen others found yourself in the upstairs accomodation (clearly beyond the bounds of the party) or by the chapel. You must have ignored signs and instructions. In any case I find it odd that you and the fifteen others didn't mention anything to a member of bar staff or a committee member.

  9. Jamie Crawford says:

    8/10

  10. Pun Man says:

    Shit story

  11. Jamie Crawford says:

    4/10 not very well written

  12. An Ed says:

    As a member of the afflicted college I feel grossly insulted by a headline which reads "Total Shit Ed's". While there is no denying that the situation caused a great deal of controversy, it is simply not acceptable that this newspaper, in particular Josh Dickens, pulverizes any sense of decency.

  13. Poo Man says:

    YEAH CHEERS!!!!

  14. And you know you are says:

    Eddies – officially the shitiest college

  15. Mr Hanky... says:

    …will bring you lots of presents for that!

  16. You missed the crux says:

    The article missed the whole scandal. The Ball launch party, inspite of the lack of convenience in the same building, went well. The real issue was the virtual incompetence of the hall staff to sort anything out over the weekend and the complete lack of concern shown till Monday morning. Indeed it's the college administration that are 'shit ed's', not the CR.

Leave a Reply